“Indefinite Driving Bans” (2024)

Guest Post by Eric Peters

There is a German word – endsieg. It translates as “final victory.” In Germany, the final victory – against cars – will take the form of indefinite bans on driving them, says the German Transport Minister, Volker Wissing.

These will be necessary, he says, in order for Germany to achieve the 65 percent reduction in carbon dioxide “emissions” of the gas that does absolutely nothing to cause or worsen air pollution by 2030, less than six years from now. An “action program” is mandated (that word, again) by the Climate Protection Act that was drawn up by Germany’s former chancellor, Angela Merkel – who grew up in the “Democratic” Republic of East Germany and whose actions and history prior to and as chancellor of a re-unified Germany indicate she misses her old Germany, where poverty was policy but imposed in the name of a different politics.

Being green is the new red – but one thing that’s the same is the masses must be controlled. You cannot have the kind of “democratic” society they had in the former East Germany with the masses free to drive wherever they want to go, anytime they like.

The two are simply incompatible.

But how to sell – and impose – the “indefinite driving bans” that are necessary to turn a country red? Simple. You insist that it’s the green thing to do. This is evil genius because it uses the average person’s desire to not be the cause of harm against him – by getting him to believe his very existence constitutes a threat. Because his very existence “contributes” to the “changing” of the “climate” via the “emission” of the gas he exhales every time he breathes – and never mind when he drives. It is Leninist shaming of a high order and has been extremely effective in getting millions of people who don’t want to think of themselves as bad people to bow low and accept their fundamental badness. Which entails their acceptance of what’s necessary to correct for it.

Not just in Germany, either.

How many millions of Americans are not only ready to accept red in the name of green but actively agitating for it? Lenin referred to these people (most of whom are not bad people but deluded people) as useful idiots, revealing his contempt for them as well as the truth about them. They think they are doing – and advocating for – the right thing, having been brilliantly misled into believing they are.

The “mask” militants were (and still are) of the same species. They see themselves as in the right and that makes them incandescently dangerous because thinking one is in the right in a crusade against what is wrong arouses a kind of rabid destructive impulse best described by the saying attributed to the 13th century papal legate Arnaud Alamric during the so-called Albigensian Crusade, which was in fact a genocidal effort to exterminate the “heretic” Cathars, a Gnostic sect that did not agree with (or abide by) the Catholic Church’s teachings. The hilariously named Pope Innocent III sent Alamric and an army of armed men styled “crusaders” to root out the Cathars hiding in a town in southern France called Beziers in 1209.

When asked by one of his armed crusaders how to separate out the innocent (as the Church viewed them) townspeople from the depraved heretics, Alamric’s solution was as simple as it was horrible:

“Kill them all,” history credits him with advising. “God will know his own.”

This is mindset we’re dealing with – and not just with regard to “masks.” The same usefulness is being used to do to people who drive what was done to people who refused to put on the “mask.”

They are in the wrong. They are causing harm. And we – the latter-day crusaders – are in the right.

The common thread is the use of people’s goodness – their misdirected belief that they are doing the right thing – to get them to not only do horrible things but persuade them of the urgent necessity that it be done right now – because there’s no time to lose. This is precisely why the verbiage has transitioned from the “climate” is “changing” (much too soft) to the “climate emergency.”

If you accept that there is an emergency, you have agreed something, anything – everything – must be done to mitigate it.

This is how green is being used to further the endsieg of red, rebranded.

In Germany, there is literally a Green Party that is in fact the red party. But this is mere semantics. We have the same party here. It has rebranded itself as “democratic,” which in a way it is, when you reflect upon what “democracy” always entails. It is not for nothing that the red used to style their countries “democratic.” Like Merkel’s country, the former Deutsche Demokratische Republic (DDR).

And it was very “democratic” indeed.

Such “democracy” is aborning in what used to be this republic. And it is being midwifed into existence by useful idiots who cannot see that green is red.

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise